October 7, 2017

Mariano: Michael Gaffney and the local media dustup

Print More

Worcester Sun

Councilor Michael Gaffney, with his wife, Coreen.

Ray Mariano

City Councilor Michael Gaffney has been in the local news a great deal lately – often not for a policy position he has taken, but as a result of his relationship with the local media and specific members of the media. As an ultimate show of contempt, Mr. Gaffney has refused to respond to media inquiries throughout the current election season.

Like President Trump and the national media, local emotions surrounding the Gaffney/media dustup are running pretty high.

The media’s treatment of Gaffney

I cannot remember a more volatile relationship between one city councilor and the collective local media. The first time I ran for mayor, the Worcester Telegram publisher and the lead editorial writer did everything they could to stop me from being elected. Even some of their reporters found their efforts so repugnant that they would concede, when they called to ask a question, that they thought the ensuing story was not fair but they were “told they had to call.”

But there were others in the media who were fair, some even kind, in their treatment of me and my candidacy. And once the election was over everything settled down, and the media was generally fair and reasonable.

Related Mariano: Media must stop whining about Trump

With the exception of local blog Turtleboy Sports, Mr. Gaffney seems to have just about everyone else looking for his scalp. While some of the critical comments are, in my opinion, fair and within the boundaries of reasonable journalism and commentary, some are not.

Commenting on the 2015  local elections, Worcester Telegram columnist Clive McFarlane wrote: “… Mr. Gaffney, who is openly dismissive of criminal justice reform advocates in this city and who seemed inclined to turn the public schools into armed encampments, is now the vice chairman of the City Council. And every time he swings that gavel in the people’s chamber, it will likely resonate among the city’s community of color with the sting of a slave master’s whip.”

The point Mr. McFarlane was trying to make was that Mr. Gaffney wanted more local police in the public schools. I am only guessing he felt the presence of police would disproportionately hurt minority students.

Reasonable people can disagree on the proper role of police in a public school setting. But Mr. McFarlane went way beyond what could be considered reasonable commentary. I cannot think of anything worse. In all my years in public office, that is one of the most outrageous things I have ever seen printed in a respectable newspaper.

More recently, Worcester Magazine reporter William Shaner went out of his way to try to link Mr. Gaffney to a white supremacist.

Shaner wrote: “Quoting a white supremacist is not the best look, especially after one of them rammed a car into a group of people, killing one and injuring 19.” Mr. Shaner went on to refer to an article Mr. Gaffney wrote in the Worcester Independent Leader. Mr. Gaffney used a famous quotation to make his point. “To learn who rules you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

Mr. Shaner acknowledged that Gaffney, like most other people, thought this quote was from the French writer/philosopher Voltaire. Whether Voltaire actually made these comments is disputed. He pointed out that, in fact, the quote was more likely from a white supremacist named Kevin Alfred Strom, a despicable person who “denied the Holocaust, advocated for a Neo-Nazi party and pleaded guilty to child pornography possession charge.”

If most people think Voltaire made the remarks, why would the reporter go out of his way to try to link Gaffney to what would have clearly been an honest mistake? Perhaps the better question is this: If someone else made this mistake, someone like Sarai Rivera or Joe Petty, would the reporter have taken the time to point out the discrepancy?

I understand why Michael Gaffney is upset with the local media.

Of course, Gaffney supporters have screamed that his treatment by most local media has been unfair. And many people have taken sides both for and against Mr. Gaffney on the basis of the comments made by the media.

Interestingly, I have spoken to a number of people who do not necessarily support Gaffney, but who think the local media is being unfair to him. “This isn’t news,” said a local voter who has never voted for Gaffney. “I’m no Gaffney fan, but they are ganging up on him and that’s not right.”

The sources of concern

There appear to be two primary sources for the racially tinged complaints against Councilor Gaffney.

The first is Mr. Gaffney questioning a minority-run, local nonprofit agency, Mosaic Cultural Complex, which accepted grant money from the city. Mr. Gaffney said the agency had used its facilities for political purposes, including being involved in a Black Lives Matter protest at Kelley Square. The city conducted an audit of the agency and a serious management issue was found, including lack of proper documentation and reporting.

Second is Mr. Gaffney’s relationship with Turtleboy Sports. A number of local activists have accused the writers at Turtleboy, among other things, of being racist. They complain that by advertising his legal services on the blog, Mr. Gaffney is associating with racists and therefore is one himself.

Gaffney’s response

Two wrongs don’t make a right.

Mr. Gaffney’s response to his media critics has been equally as volatile and over-reactive as the people he has disagreements with. He has personally attacked his media critics with a ferocity that we have never seen locally.

He has posted personal comments on Facebook and then, like a child watching the wind take his kite higher and higher, sat back and watched people on social media try to destroy his opponents. And when the wind comes out from under his kite, he blasts new air into social media to keep his kite flying.

In particular, his recent campaign to destroy the editor of Worcester Magazine has been disgraceful. I understand why he is angry, but his response put him right in the middle of the mud pile he was complaining about.

Mr. Gaffney released portions of online conversations the editor, Walter Bird Jr., had with a woman in 2015 saying the texts were part of a campaign of sexual harassment by the editor. Mr. Gaffney threatened to release other texts from two other women. As a result, the editor was suspended by Worcester Magazine and an investigation was conducted. The internal investigation found the exchanges to be consensual and the editor was allowed to return to work.

Instead of going to the appropriate authorities or encouraging the women who complained to him to do so, Mr. Gaffney held the damaging information for months and then released it as an attack when he felt he had been harmed – and in a way that would do the most personal damage to the editor.

Like I said, I think some of the comments made about Michael Gaffney have been unfair and beyond the bounds of responsible journalism. But his response has been equally inappropriate – perhaps more so.

Stop the personal attacks

How should Mr. Gaffney have responded? First, he should never have responded with personal attacks. But personal attacks seem to be his modus operandi.

And second, he should have relied on the good judgment of people watching and reading the news to decide what was, and was not, fair.

I remember in my first campaign for mayor, when I thought the Telegram had gone well beyond the boundaries of a respectable publication. Its attacks on me were vicious. Near the end of the campaign, I had gone through enough. I put together a scathing written response which we intended to distribute to every household in Worcester.

I called my campaign steering committee together and went around the room and asked each person, one-by-one, what they thought we should do. Every one of the 30 or so campaign supporters in the room was as angry as I was. They wanted to hit back and hit back hard.

When everyone was done venting their anger, I tore up the material I had prepared to respond. They were stunned. I explained that if everyone could clearly see that the Telegram had gone way beyond the line, so could all of the voters in Worcester. There was no need to respond. We would keep our hands by our sides and let the good voters do what they knew was right. Personally and politically, it turned out to be the right decision.

Just like our personal focus on President Trump takes away from our focus on the important issues facing our country, the media focusing on Michael Gaffney and calling him names only takes our eye off the ball – safer neighborhoods, cleaner streets and better schools.

Locally, we need to resist the personal attacks that have become so commonplace in our national politics. We need to stay focused on what matters.

Editor’s note: We hope you’ve enjoyed this free preview of Ray’s unique perspective and unmistakable candor. Be sure to check back in coming weeks to find out how you can keep on reading Worcester’s best commentary without becoming a Sun member when the preview ends. Ray can be reached via email at Mariano@worcester.ma.

Raymond V. Mariano is a Worcester Sun columnist. He comments on his hometown and global issues that impact it every Sunday in Worcester Sun.

113 thoughts on “Mariano: Michael Gaffney and the local media dustup

  1. Ray, Thank you for admitting that the media has overstepped their bounds and Clive wrote “one of the most outrageous things I have ever seen printed in a respectable newspaper”.(Although respectable is a loose term here.) Yes, we all realize that a nasty media can come with the territory. The Gaffneys can handle the ridicule of their beautifying efforts in Sarai Rivera’s filthy, garbage-filled district or Williamson’s silly and petty rants about Mike’s hair.
    But, I cannot imagine you, or any respectable leader, continuously being referred to as a racist and just taking it on the chin. It’s a whole new ball game when you bring the ‘R’ into it. And when you have fellow councilors, like Sarai Rivera, lighting the fire, it becomes deeply concerning for our city. Holding onto “damaging information for months and then releasing it when he felt he had been harmed” is right out of the Democrat’s playbook (Hillary ring a bell?) Somehow it’s now abhorrent when a conservatives uses the same tactic.Still doesn’t give Walter a pass. In our current environment, social media gives politicians the opportunity to respond, expose the lies and reveal the truth. The liberal media no longer has the market cornered and they are beside themselves.
    I like that Gaffney fights back. That’s his appeal. He will take on anyone to do what’s right for this city and us taxpayers. He exposed the fraudulent actions and thievery of Mosaic (the Council voted 11-0 in favor of audit) and Rivera’s unscrupulous behavior trying to use public funds to level her dilapitated church. He stood up to Ed Augustus for overtaxing Worcester residents and called out Petty’s wimpiness to call this a sanctuary city. (Yet, it was Petty who called the illegal immigrants ‘uneducated’ ‘morons’ and the media gave him a warm cup of cocoa and a fuzzy blanket. ) We are a city being governed by one man…Rep. Jim McGovern. And it is clear that anyone who dares rock the boat will be attacked viciously and without apology. No doubt these are the same people with a “Hate has no home here” sign on their lawns. How ironic.

    • I don’t think Mr. Gaffney should take it on the chin. He has the Ishtar to defend hims of. Yes, he should respond when he feels he has been wronged. Yes, he should defend himself. But, he should stay away from the personal attacks -the very thing he has accused others of. Rely on voters to see things for what they are.

  2. Mr. Mariano ably expresses how to play by the rules of politics of a bygone era. It can be entertaining to watch Spencer Tracy in “The Last Hurrah” but that story should not be interpreted as a primer on how campaigns are run today in our Commonwealth. Nor should anyone watch “Citizen Kane” as a how to lesson on building a media empire. Both media and politics have coarsened over the years. Vulgarities, lies, and hateful epithets have pushed out all other forms of discourse in both venues.

    While I encourage Mr. Mariano to defend the old chivalry, it is naive to believe it is coming back anytime soon.

  3. Dustup? You jest, if you don’t see a cultural/political war happening, then you’re deaf and dumb. That said.
    Mike Gaffney is the David in the Goliath parable, standing up to the socialists in Worcester. Why is Petty and his gang of spineless liberal apologists so threatened by one person? Worcester as it stands today is run by a bunch of white people who do what they want and lash out at people who try better (for ex., expose the corruption at city hall – recall Mosaic, it was out right theft, Gaffney was called racist) the lives for all in Worcester. Yes, I do believe that.
    I concur with the commenter Collen (Gaffney), blame the McGovern crime family, out to protect its turf and any threat to the existing order is to be dealt with by vicious personal attacks by his henchmen – Petty and his mindless council, and of course, the so called local media.
    The local media, led by the likes Walter Bird/Womag, by anyone’s definition, a dirty old man who knows no boundaries, using his position to entreat female city hall employees into trysts. That is somehow excusable – they’re adults? In another business Bird would have been fired. The same with the T&G’s Williamson and her despicable public attack of a tow truck driver, a good Samaritan – she’s just having fun. If anyone else does it (Turtleboy for example) its despicable racism or hate speech?
    Recall the Williamson’s laughable defense of Petty’s hot mic blunder? McFarlane’s incessant brutal attacks on Gaffney and his wife? Whatever happened to impartiality – they classify it as opinion so they can lie and spin as they please. Recently Williamson publically libeled Gaffney, yet there are no consequences? Just a small print correction makes it okay. What is the T&G thinking?
    If Womag, T&G etc. think they have credibility, then they’re truly delusional. And they call Gaffney an unethical, racist monster out to destroy Worcester’s minorities. The fact is the Worcester media has lost its collective mind, and we all pay for it. Will that ever change? No, and it’s too late, there’s no turning back for them, they don’t care. All credibility has been lost and they don’t care. Local liberals enable them.
    Can someone tell me what exactly has McGovern done in 20 years?

  4. Our Founding Fathers regarded the Media as a vital organ to prevent the excesses of whoever was in power. They did NOT ever refer to or specify one party or another’s train of thought.
    Contrast this philosophy with the Media (Including the T&G.) of today. Largely favoring the Democratic Party because of this Part’s practice of vote buying by the wholesale spending of public funds in the form of free entitlements.
    It appears to me that Gaffney, along with one other person (Lukes) are lone voices crying out for a return to the sanity proposed when our country was founded.

  5. I disagree with Ray that voters know who they are voting for especially when Ray ran for Mayor of Worcester. No one had computers then.

  6. Hey there! This post couldn’t be written any better!
    Reading through this post reminds me of my
    good old room mate! He always kept chatting about
    this. I will forward this post to him. Pretty sure he will have a good read.
    Many thanks for sharing!

  7. Thanks for the marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading
    it, you can be a great author.I will ensure that I
    bookmark your blog and may come back down the road. I want to encourage you continue your great writing, have a nice morning!

  8. Great goods from you, man. I’ve take into accout
    your stuff previous to and you are simply extremely
    magnificent. I really like what you’ve obtained here, really like
    what you are stating and the best way wherein you are saying it.
    You make it enjoyable and you still care for
    to stay it wise. I can not wait to learn far more from
    you. This is really a tremendous web site.

  9. Good day! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog
    platform are you using for this site? I’m getting tired of WordPress because I’ve had
    problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform.
    I would be fantastic if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  10. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative.
    I am going to watch out for brussels. I will be grateful if you continue this in future.
    Numerous people will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  11. The staff was excellent in dealing with withdrawals and addictions.
    It’s amazing what I have achieved in 10 days and the staff have been great regarding the
    COVID situation and zoom meetings. I haven’t felt alone here
    and I would recommend coming here to anyone. I am looking forward to the
    next 3 weeks.

  12. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it is truly informative I’m going to watch out for brussels I’ll be grateful if you continue this in future Numerous people will be benefited from your writing Cheers!
    my website경마사이트,

  13. An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a friend who had been doing a little homework on thisAnd he in fact ordered me dinner because I found it for him…lol So allow me to reword this… Thanks for themeal!! But yeah, thanx for spending time to discuss thissubject here on your blog
    my website경마사이트

  14. I’d like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing
    this site. I am hoping to view the same high-grade blog
    posts by you in the future as well. In truth, your creative writing abilities has encouraged me to get my very own blog now 😉

  15. Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason appeared to be on the
    net the easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while people think about worries that they just don’t know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the
    whole thing without having side effect , people can take a signal.
    Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  16. Hmm it seems like your website ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so
    I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your
    blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to everything.

    Do you have any tips and hints for novice blog writers?

    I’d really appreciate it.

  17. Hello there, You’ve done a great job. I’ll
    definitely digg it and personally suggest to my friends.
    I am sure they’ll be benefited from this web site.

  18. Hello there, You have done a great job. I will definitely digg it
    and personally suggest to my friends. I’m sure they will be benefited from this web site.

  19. You really make it appear really easy along with your presentation but
    I find this topic to be really one thing which I think I might
    by no means understand. It sort of feels too complicated and extremely huge for me.

    I’m having a look ahead for your next put up, I will attempt to get the dangle
    of it!

  20. Hello, i think that i saw you visited my web site so i came to “return the favor”.I’m
    attempting to findd things to enhance my website!Isuppose
    itts ok to use sone of your ideas!!
    web site

  21. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?

    I mean, what you say is fundamental and everything. But think about if you added some great visuals or
    videos to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this website could definitely be
    one of the best in its field. Wonderful blog!

  22. Hello. This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my previous room mate.
    He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this page to
    him. Fairly certain he will have a good read.
    Thank you for sharing.

  23. My developer is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses.
    But he’s trying none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on several websites for about a year and am anxious
    about switching to another platform. I have heard great things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can transfer all my WordPress posts into it?

    Any help would be appreciated.

  24. I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But wanna remark on some general things, The website style is perfect, the articles is really great : D. Good job, cheers|

  25. Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your website? My blog site is in the exact same niche as yours and my users would certainly benefit from some of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you. Thanks a lot!|

  26. Do you have a spam issue on this website; I also am a blogger, and I wanted to know your situation; many of
    us have developed some nice methods, and we are looking to trade methods with others, why
    not shoot me an e-mail if interested.

  27. Howdy, would you mind letting me know which web host you’re utilizing?
    I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different web browsers, and I must say
    this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Can you
    suggest a good internet hosting provider at a reasonable price?

  28. I was extravagantly impressed with their service!

    It was an amazing journey here. They saved my messy life and bring
    me to a new and clear life. I was treated with
    exceptionally decent and got all that I expected to
    get by and feel as comfortable as possible. Thank you so much for your help.
    I have recovered finally!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *